Releasing Alphas and Betas without "freezing"
rick.spencer at canonical.com
Wed Jun 20 06:22:37 UTC 2012
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Martin Pitt <martin.pitt at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Scott Kitterman [2012-06-19 22:16 -0400]:
> +1 as well, thanks Michael and Scott.
> Also, saying "we'll drop milestones and introduce a regular schedule
> for testing some particular dailies to fix bugs not caught by
> automatic tests" means nothing more than a simple renaming -- because
> that's exactly what milestones are today. So I also think that proved
> nicely what their purpose is and that we cannot do without them.
Indeed, the correct cadence of testing is orthogonal to the existence
of milestones. If we need more frequent and rigorous manual testing,
we should just do it.
More information about the ubuntu-devel