Releasing Alphas and Betas without "freezing"
robert.ancell at canonical.com
Sun Jun 17 21:25:39 UTC 2012
On 16/06/12 02:12, Rick Spencer wrote:
> In short, freezing the archive before an alpha or beta should not
> actually be contributing to either ensuring the installability of
> Ubuntu images or ensuring the quality of these images. This implies,
> therefore, that all the work around freezing, and all the productivity
> lost during a freeze, actually subtracts from the quality of Ubuntu by
> reducing our overall velocity for both features and bug fixes, since
> every day the image is good quality, and Alpha or Beta should be just
> that day's image tagged appropriately.
In particular I find the alpha freeze kills our velocity and I wonder
how more useful than a daily build the alpha release is (given it's so
early in the cycle anyway). I'd support dropping the alpha and pointing
at the dailies.
More information about the ubuntu-devel