Patch Pilot Report 20120615

Clint Byrum clint at
Fri Jun 15 17:23:23 UTC 2012

Excerpts from James Page's message of 2012-06-15 05:57:41 -0700:
> Hi Daniel
> On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote:
> >>> SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to 
> >>> differentiate on the report - they don't require any further
> >>> sponsor action so it would be good to be able to filter those
> >>> out if possible.
> > That's a good point. I usually set the bug to 'fix committed',
> > subscribe myself and unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors, so I can follow
> > up if necessary.
> > 
> > Maybe this could be clearer on 
> >
> I don't think this is a challenge with bugs (although it could be more
> explicit in the Code Review docs).  Merge proposals create more of a
> challenge as I'm unable to set 'Fix Committed' in the same way so they
> just lurk around until they get 'Merged' which could take some time.
> Not sure we can do to much about that.

Can we change them to 'Approved' ? If so, that would be a good status
to filter out of the sponsoring report, and something to be careful to
only set after uploading to the -proposed queue.

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list