Patch Pilot Report 20120615

James Page at
Fri Jun 15 12:08:07 UTC 2012

Report for my patch piloting today:
  - Made minor tweak to OSGi manifest for new upstream release and
  - Checked bug report for SRU details (now present).  Changelog entry
still needs to be more verbose and versioned Build-Depends in not
present - provided further feedback to proposer.
  - Already uploaded elsewhere - requested rejection of MP in -devel.
  - Pushed debdiff to the folsom-proposed branch that feeds the
OpenStack CI environment and is the basis for the next archive upload.
Unsubscribed Ubuntu Sponsors.
  - Already uploaded - marked as 'Merged'.
  - Unsubscribed sponsors - nothing todo at this point in time.
  - Provided feedback to proposer about how new upstream releases of
openstack components are managed by the server-dev team.  Asked them
to re-submit the branch as the bug fix is OK still.  Marked WIP.
   - Already uploaded to -proposed for SRU testing - not sure how to
make these disappear from the sponsoring report.
   - Proposed merges for linked branches and un-subscribed sponsors
from main bug.
   - Both merges lacking sufficient changelog detail and incorrect
version numbers - provided feedback and set to WIP.
   - Nothing for ubuntu-sponsors TODO - unsubscribed. Pending mentor
upload in Debian.
   - Merged OK - uploaded
   - Already merged - marked appropriately.
   - Removed task for precise - not appropriate;  Reporter already
asked to submit to Debian; unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors as no further
action required.
   - Uploaded and synced from Debian already - marked 'Fix Released'
with comment.
   - Uploaded
   - Already uploaded to -proposed - added comment to bug report to
re-iterate requirement for SRU documentation.
   - Un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors - no action currently required.
   - Checked with cjwatson this was OK (new upstream release) tested
and uploaded.
   - Not actually a bug; responded to reporter and thanked the
contributor for preparing the patch but its not required.
   - Added an extra comment about the apache2 change already in
-proposed which enables this to be fixed.
   - Uploaded.

Comment for the day:

SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to
differentiate on the report - they don't require any further sponsor
action so it would be good to be able to filter those out if possible.



James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer at

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list