GCC 4.7, STL and binary compatibility of objects built with different language standards

[Steve Langasek]

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:02:08PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:11:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Do we have a list/wiki page/some other form of coordination showing the
> > packages that are:

> > - known to be clean C++98 ABI
> > - unknown
> > - known to be broken C++0x/gcc-4.7

> > If not, who will start one and where?

> It seems, none of this is needed anymore:

>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00024.html

> so we "only" need:

> - the gcc with the revert
> - a full rebuild of quantal

A full rebuild of quantal is not practical (or appropriate).  This needs in
some way to be targeted at the packages that are using C++0x.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20120703/7f8fa4c9/attachment.pgp>