Quantal archive rebuild proposal

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:11:38PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 06:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:46:50PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> >> Now that we can use -proposed during development, the only arch skew
> >> should be from autosyncs.
> > I don't think that's a realistic assessment of how -proposed will be used in
> > practice.  We should not be duplicating the entirety of Debian's testing
> > propagation - doing so would bring a whole set of other problems that we are
> > not currently set up to handle.

> The main arch skew issues in the past regarding builds as I remember
> them are glib, gtk, and openjdk which we all upload directly.  Wasn't
> the intent to use proposed for these updates during the devel cycle?

We should use -proposed for *select* uploads to the development release. 
But you said "the only arch skew should be from autosyncs", which I do not
expect to be true at all. :)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20120427/092e2eee/attachment.pgp>