[ubuntu/precise] xine-lib 1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1 (Accepted)
micahg at ubuntu.com
Sun Oct 30 22:28:20 UTC 2011
On 10/30/2011 05:49 PM, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 05:35 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> xine-lib (1.1.19-3.1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
>> * merge from debian, remaining changes:
>> - Because the following libraries are only in universe,
>> build against internal copies of:
>> - libdvdnav, libdvdread, libfaad, libvcdinfo-dev
>> - change order of the alternate dependencies libxine-plugins and
>> libxine1-misc-plugins. The former would drag in libxine1-ffmpeg
>> via recommends on the live cd.
>> * reenable xineplug_decode_image.so
>> - use libmagickwand-dev instead of graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat
>> as the former is found in ubuntu/main.
>> xine-lib (1.1.19-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
>> * Non-maintainer upload.
>> * Add patch from Reinhard Tartler to fix FTBFS with libav 0.7. Closes:
>> * Add patch from Loic Dachary to remove pvr from the plugins now that v4l
>> is gone. Enable v4l on linux instead of on !linux. Closes: #623595.
>> xine-lib (1.1.19-3) unstable; urgency=low
>> * add missing #include<X11/extensions/XvMClib.h> to avoid FTBFS,
>> Closes: #610635
>> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:58:50 +0200
>> Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de>
>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
> This is troubling, here's the last merge changelog entry:
> xine-lib (1.1.19-2ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low
> * merge from debian, remaining changes:
> - remove build-dependency on libvcdinfo-dev, fixes FTBFS.
> - don't build against system libdvdnav, libdvdread, both in universe
> - build the faad plugin against the internal copy of libfaad
> - change order of the alternate dependencies libxine-plugins and
> libxine1-misc-plugins. The former would drag in libxine1-ffmpeg
> via recommends on the live cd.
> * remove graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat, not in main
> Before, we were only using one internal library and building one
> plugin from it. Now we're building against 4 internal libraries.
> This doesn't seem like a good idea for the LTS as the security team
> will most likely have to support those embedded libraries for 5
> years. Is there a need for this change? Also, the only rdepends of
> xine-lib in main are kaffeine and kde-runtime.
> Do we need this other functionality? If so, can we please get MIRs
> for those libraries?
I have to apologize. As Colin pointed out to me in #ubuntu-devel,
nothing has actually changes between the natty and precise packages in
terms of the diff from Debian (i.e. changing which internal libraries
are built against). So, thank you Reinhard for making the current state
clearer in the changelog :). However, these should still probably be
examined for the LTS if we should be using these internal libs, MIR
them, or possibly drop them from the package.
Apologies for my hastiness,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-devel