lintian.ubuntuwire.org

[Evan Broder]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:04:35PM -0800, Evan Broder wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> > non-standard-file-perm wants files with perm 0644 instead of 0664. Is
>> > this a bug in our build farm?
>>
>> I remember there was a point during the last development cycle where
>> the umask on the buildds was incorrect. Could this be fallout from
>> that? It seems to be fairly prevalent in our builds:
>
> Yes, there was one such incident due to a broken sudo deployment.  We
> squashed it fairly quickly, but there were some builds in the meantime.
> I think we checked to make sure that those were all root:root so not too
> important, but I'd have to check back through IRC logs and the like to
> make sure.
>
> Can you check for more details?  I'd like to know if any of these are
> current, as if so then we still have a buildd problem which we need to
> fix ASAP.  I'd also like to know if there are any files with ownership
> other than root:root in this set.  If you can't get that information
> easily, then the full list of affected files and packages would be a
> good start.

On a second look, I don't actually think this is connected to that
incident. Benjamin's example package, audacity, was last built 4 weeks
ago.

I've collected all packages/files triggering the warning; it's at
http://web.mit.edu/broder/Public/non-standard-file-perm