Do you use Binary package hint: line in bug description?
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
Fri Jul 15 14:31:53 UTC 2011
On 11-07-15 09:51 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This would remove the last reference to the binary package. It may not be
> needed by source packages with just one or two binary packages, but it is useful
> to have when a source package builds a dozen or so packages.
Hi Matthias,
Indeed, there are no more binary package information recorded in the bug
report.
I guess this is really useful for very few packages. If that's a
use-case you care a lot about, it would be worth filing a bug about. And
in that case, it's probably a regression which would put it in the
top-tier of bugs to fix.
--
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20110715/1a216000/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list