Shall we hide the GUI for Hibernate in Natty?
Brian Curtis
bcurtiswx at ubuntu.com
Mon Jan 31 19:30:13 UTC 2011
Because of the fact that hibernate (if it fails) can destroy someones
work, I don't feel that the decision to remove hibernate is a bad idea
at all.
If there were time to make it work without a doubt, knowing that
people won't lose their work, then maybe at a future time it would be
plausible to bring back the discussion to see if it would be used
more.
Just my .02
~Brian
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Otto Kekäläinen <otto at sange.fi> wrote:
> I'm in favor of removing hibernate for the reasons Rick expressed.
>
> ma, 2011-01-31 kello 11:04 -0800, Rick Spencer kirjoitti:
>> However, Hibernate works well for some users, so this will be a
>> painful
>> regression[1].
>
> Hibernate works well on my computer, however the speed of starting from
> zero, loading grub, loading kernel, loading saved memory state and
> showing the desktop etc (the hibernate does) is almost the exactly same
> as doing a normal startup, so the hibernate mode is quite useless.
>
> The work done on upstart and other boot time improvements has made
> hibernate obsolete. Thanks!
>
> --
> | Otto Kekäläinen
> | http://www.sange.fi/
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-desktop mailing list
> ubuntu-desktop at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
>
--
Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
--Wernher Von Braun
"The second law of thermodynamics: If you think things are in a mess
now, JUST WAIT!!"
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Statement Below is True
The Statement Above is False
----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list