DMB: Proposal for a different review process

[Mackenzie Morgan]

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>>
>> Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting
>> special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical.
> this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
> caused you to start this rant against canonical ...

See Robbie & Dustin both second-guessing the DMB here in [2]
Dustin got upset here [3], when an applicant who said he believed his
work to be on a "separate project" [4] did not get accepted.
There was also the time Robbie criticized the regional board for
saying Kate hadn't been around long enough yet for membership [5]

> [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt

[2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:19
[3] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:00
[4] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:45
[5] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/17/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t04:21

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan