DMB: Proposal for a different review process

[Luke Faraone]

On 08/03/2011 03:51 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I think the message isn't that there aren't unforeseen circumstances.
>> It's that they need to be handled in a better fashion. Custom courtesy
>> (where I'm from at least :) says that meetings that are cancelled or
>> postponed have advance notice of at least 24 hours. If you can't give 24
>> hour notice of an absence, then perhaps you should reconsider if you are
>> a good fit for the board.
> 
> Maybe the boards should be limited to people who's employment includes their 
> work on the board so they can be reliable?

If the problem is a lack of quorum, perhaps we should have DMB members
check in ahead of time (think, like a day) as to whether they can make
the meeting. That should give people a better idea whether the meeting
will actually occur, and allow meetings that would otherwise not have a
quorum to be canceled outright.

-- 
Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems
lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc
PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20110803/2b28b6a3/attachment.pgp>