Boost library proposal for Natty
Barry Warsaw
barry at canonical.com
Thu Oct 14 17:21:37 BST 2010
On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Yes, but for boost the associated benefits and resources to package the new
>version and fix all the rdepends are much less. If someone is really
>motivated about boost, please speak up and drive ahead. Absent that we should
>just follow Debian.
That's probably a good rule to follow in general. :)
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20101014/e8d51c7f/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list