continuing conversation from UDS-N - Application Review Board
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Thu Nov 18 17:22:35 GMT 2010
Philipp Kern [2010-11-17 11:35 +0100]:
> FWIW (and I didn't see this raised in this thread) FQDNs do not need to be
> registered with the LANANA and can be used instead of a registered string
> (see ). So if you distribute the packages through extras.ubuntu.com
> anyway, it might make sense to reuse the same name here.
I think that's a nice idea. It avoids namespace collisions (with host
names being unique), and denotes more clearly where they come from.
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20101118/6698d48f/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel