continuing conversation from UDS-N - Application Review Board

[Scott Kitterman]

"Rick Spencer" <rick.spencer at canonical.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:21 -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
>> - They suggested /opt/ubuntu/<appname> instead of
>/opt/extras/<appname> 
>> as the private install location, with the note that (respecting the
>FHS) 
>> we need to register the provider name with LANANA, and "ubuntu" is
>more 
>> sensible in that general context than "extras".
>Does "/opt/ubuntu/" perhaps suggest a bit of "officialness" or support
>from the Ubuntu community, whereas these apps are specifically *not*
>suppose to have such a connotation?
>
Definitely.

Scott K