continuing conversation from UDS-N - Application Review Board

Rick Spencer rick.spencer at canonical.com
Tue Nov 16 19:38:19 GMT 2010


On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:21 -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
> - They suggested /opt/ubuntu/<appname> instead of /opt/extras/<appname> 
> as the private install location, with the note that (respecting the FHS) 
> we need to register the provider name with LANANA, and "ubuntu" is more 
> sensible in that general context than "extras".
Does "/opt/ubuntu/" perhaps suggest a bit of "officialness" or support
from the Ubuntu community, whereas these apps are specifically *not*
suppose to have such a connotation?

Cheers, Rick




More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list