Proposal for a JavaLibraryFreeze

[Barry Warsaw]

On Nov 04, 2010, at 01:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:

>On Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:08:02 pm Robbie Williamson wrote:
>> Given how adding more freezes is suboptimal, another option is to roll
>> these into the DIF, and have it stand for
>> DistroInfrastructureFreeze...or something like that.
>> 
>For Python, I think that's not a bad time to be making the final decision
>about what version is default, but I think for introducing new supported
>versions, it's far too late.  I think new Python (and in the future, Python3)
>versions should should be introduce with or at the latest shortly after the
>toolchain for the release (which is what we've done this cycle with Python
>2.7).

+1
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20101104/0c1f0e55/attachment.pgp