Rethinking UDS

[Scott Kitterman]

"Rick Spencer" <rick.spencer at canonical.com> wrote:

>Le samedi 29 mai 2010 à 19:26 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
>> Rick Spencer [2010-05-28 11:23 -0700]:
>> > I also think that I/we could do more work *before* UDS ensuring that we
>> > are gathering input on the agenda, and that we are able to collect and
>> > use that input.
>> 
>> If we can get that feedback from the community as well, not just from
>> Canonical, that would certainly help. OTOH I think that doing even
>> more decisions before UDS will shift UDS even more from idea gathering
>> to talking about implementation details. Whether or not this is
>> desirable is a matter of defining what UDS should be for, of course.
>Actual, it was only input from the community that I was referring to. 
>
I don't recall which cycle it was, but once we were asked for spec inputs before UDS. My recollection is that as a community developer I found it very hard to carve out the time to really focus on specs before UDS.  

UDS is the only time on the cycle I'm free to focus on Ubuntu without distraction. 

Scott K