Request For Candidates: Application Review Board

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

Am Monday 16 August 2010 22:26:29 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Stefan Potyra
>
> <stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> > What is particularly worth investigating regarding m+1's release? How
> > will the upgrade path of these applications be handled? (especially,
> > since -- as far as I understand it -- these applications are meant to be
> > targetted only at a specific release, something which apt doesn't handle
> > (yet?))
>
> In the usual way, if a package isn't in the archive for the new
> release, you get a notification that the software is obsolete and a
> request for removal.  I imagine it'd be the same here.

Hm... apt doesn't track that information afaik. Are you referring to 
update-manager? If so, is an upgrade path implemented within update-manager? 
In what way? The one you described?

Cheers,
  Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20100816/d2fbf5cc/attachment.pgp