Review: Syncing from testing a success?
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Tue Apr 20 20:15:52 BST 2010
"Kees Cook" <kees at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> The problem in the past was that there were quite a lot of transitions
>> which were only half-done because DIF hit in the middle of them. It
>> seems to me that an immediate transition of all affected packages
>> handled this much better?
>This is probably true. I don't have a strong opinion about it, as it was
>only a single glitch I hit.
I think they are both true.
Syncing from Testing we get only completed transitions, but the risks of archive skew are greater.
We've still got some packages that are depwait because a sufficient version of a build depend didn't make it (and I was involved in a couple of forced downgrades already), so this isn't a panacea.
More information about the ubuntu-devel