Merging with Bazaar
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Sun Nov 8 07:52:15 GMT 2009
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> On 06/11/2009, at 00.55, James Westby wrote:
> > We are now finally in a position to make this problem go away.
> > Therefore
> > I need to know candidate packages that this should be done for. The
> > following criteria must be met:
> > * You are happy to have a bot commit to the branch if someone else
> > uploads without pushing.
> > * The branch contains the full source of the package, not just
> > ./debian/, and you are willing to embrace the proposed way of
> > structuring the package. I know some people are attached to their
> > ./debian/ only branches, but that way is an evolutionary dead-end,
> > so I am unwilling to make it part of this effort.
> > * The branch is up to date with what is in the archive.
> I would much enjoy to see some examples where the packager maintains
> the package in an LP-branch like James describes above. Could someone
> post some pointers, please? TIA!
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:40:11PM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote:
> Firefox is maintained in bzr, aswell as xulrunner.
No, firefox's bzr branch only contains the debian/ directory.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20091107/faf64b34/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel