Merging with Bazaar

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at
Sun Nov 8 07:52:15 GMT 2009

On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:

> On 06/11/2009, at 00.55, James Westby wrote:

> > We are now finally in a position to make this problem go away.  
> > Therefore
> > I need to know candidate packages that this should be done for. The
> > following criteria must be met:

> >   * You are happy to have a bot commit to the branch if someone else
> >     uploads without pushing.

> >   * The branch contains the full source of the package, not just
> >     ./debian/, and you are willing to embrace the proposed way of
> >     structuring the package. I know some people are attached to their
> >     ./debian/ only branches, but that way is an evolutionary dead-end,
> >     so I am unwilling to make it part of this effort.

> >   * The branch is up to date with what is in the archive.

> I would much enjoy to see some examples where the packager maintains  
> the package in an LP-branch like James describes above. Could someone  
> post some pointers, please? TIA!


On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:40:11PM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote:
> Firefox is maintained in bzr, aswell as xulrunner.

No, firefox's bzr branch only contains the debian/ directory.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                          
slangasek at                                     vorlon at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list