Lucid auto-syncing with Debian testing

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at
Mon Nov 2 23:43:36 GMT 2009

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2009-11-02 08:54:24 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > It sounds like we are past the Rubicon, so we ought to focus on 
> > documentation and updating needed tools.  In addition to MoM (as I mention 
> > above) and requestsync, that others have mentioned, I'm pretty sure there 
> > are others.  The u-u-d-t pull-debian-source script is one that comes to 
> > mind.

> I've changed the defaults for requestsync and pull-debian-source in the
> ubuntu-dev-tools bzr.

> But I'm not sure yet if and how to update ubuntu-dev-tools in karmic: is
> a backport enough (once the changes got uploaded to lucid) or better
> prepare a SRU so it reaches far more developers and contributors?

Unless motu-sru object, I think this is appropriate for an SRU.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                          
slangasek at                                     vorlon at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list