ted at ubuntu.com
Mon Mar 9 13:23:17 GMT 2009
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 21:25 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:57:13 +0000 Ted Gould <ted at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> That makes sense to me, but I'm not as sure about how all that works.
> >> Perhaps we could discuss this with everyone at the next Ubuntu Desktop
> >> meeting? I think that'd probably be a good place to work out the
> >> dependencies correctly.
> > I'm not generally at those meetings, so I can't say if the right people
> > would be there or not. My thought is that if it's decided that
> > notifications should be part of the 'standard' pidgin experience then the
> > package should recommend the standard library for providing it.
> As someone that manages a derivative (Ubuntu Studio) this is one change
> (though we are currently testing notify-osd) we don't want forced on us
> as a recommend. We already have mixed feedback from our users.
I'm confused now :)
All I'd really like is for the default experience that people get is
that they get Pidgin configured to work well with notify-osd. How it
gets packaged to do that is not my expertise.
Can someone suggest the best way to do that in a way that works well for
derivates? I'm quite sure I don't understand all the packaging issues
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090309/51a23b01/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel