Notifications: uselessness of
Mat Tomaszewski
mat.tomaszewski at canonical.com
Mon Mar 2 10:00:28 GMT 2009
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:52:01 +0000 Mat Tomaszewski
> <mat.tomaszewski at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to reiterate the main point: we have a good reason to
>> believe that persistent indicators only work for some very specific
>> cases (examples being network connection, volume, etc).
>>
>
> References please ....
>
>
There's a strong tendency in some discussions to call upon "hard
proofs", whenever convenient. I could do exactly the same thing and ask
you to point me to the research that shows the effectiveness of the
update-notifier icon.
As Matthew mentioned earlier, some areas are difficult to apply direct,
"hard" tests to. Not to mention time and cost. However, there is a vast
array of examples which show that whenever the important decision needs
to be made it is better to present it to the user directly. It is
crucial that people do update their system regularly and we really want
to make sure they do. I agree it may not be the most elegant and classy
way of doing it, and as soon as we find a better way, we'll implement
it. Any suggestions are most welcome. For now though we are determined
to see whether and how the new solution works out for Ubuntu users.
Thanks again for your feedback.
Regards,
Mat
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list