Developer Application Criteria - Was Re: New Application processes
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Mon Jan 19 14:59:55 GMT 2009
Jordan Mantha [2009-01-08 9:11 -0800]:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > If there is *no* objective component to MOTU/CoreDev application
> > assessment, then I don't think it's fair to make arbitrary,
> > *quantitative* criticisms on an application.
> I don't think that's necessarily a logical conclusion. You're saying
> that if the +1/-1 of a MOTU Council member is based on a subjective
> decision that they can't use objective data in making that decision.
I don't actually see that happen. It's the advocates/sponsors who
convert their subjective impression into a +1/-1 which can then be
counted by the council. So if the guideline is e. g. "a candiate gets
approved if he has >= 3 advocates and no objections", this is not a
subjective criteria from the council.
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
More information about the ubuntu-devel