Call for testing: hwclock changes

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 15:28 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

> Should /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh be stripped down to be a no-op on 'start',
> since there's no longer any reason to call it with this argument?
> 
I left this there for maximum Debian compatibility - LaMont likes as
small a delta as possible, and it means it's trivial to put back if
people have a genuine use-case for it.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090218/6608b1ef/attachment.pgp