powernowd vs. ondemand governor
Scott James Remnant
scott at canonical.com
Tue Feb 17 18:35:04 GMT 2009
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 18:05 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:58:32PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> > The very fact it's done by grepping kernel supplied information means
> > that we're just working around kernel lazyness. This could be
> > auto-loaded by the kernel, or it could be auto-loaded by udev if the
> > kernel supplied enough information.
>
> Not really, no. Knowing whether acpi-cpufreq can bind requires
> evaluating certain ACPI methods, and once you've evaluated those the
> firmware will (on some systems) make assumptions about the level of OS
> support.
>
This is the key one though, if I'm reading things right? There may be a
more specific module, and acpi-cpufreq is a fallback we should try last?
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090217/d267733e/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list