Best practice for reporting bugs

[( ``-_-´´ ) -- BUGabundo]

Olá Mackenzie e a todos.

On Tuesday 31 March 2009 16:46:51 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 30 March 2009 6:48:44 pm (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> > Am I making such an hard question, or using the wrong example?
> 
> People and teams can have PPAs.  Neither have BTS.  Why are we discussing this 
> here?  This ought to be on launchpad-users, since it's LP that doesn't have 
> Malone for anything but distributions and projects.

This is dragging much more then I wished it too.
Let me give a couple of examples:
Gwibber and Medibuntu packages.

Pressing on Help-> Report a Problem on Gwibber (from a PPA) will lead me to https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+filebug
Medibuntu bumps Archive Packages apps, and requests for bugs to be filed on their LP bug BTS (https://bugs.launchpad.net/medibuntu/+filebug)

So if apport (remember this was where I started my interaction with this thread) is so smart about packages, why not report to the proper BTS instead of failing with has it does with some packages?


PS. I just tested $ apport-cli -fp gwibber and it took me to the correct place, so I'm happy. EOL

-- 
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´)	http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
http://BUGabundo.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20090401/52180aed/attachment.pgp