Patch Statuses in Launchpad

[Scott Kitterman]

On Monday 26 May 2008 12:23, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Scott Kitterman schrieb:
> > This is what I've always done.  If a patch is attached that I review and
> > it needs wore work, I just uncheck patch and it drops off the list until
> > an updated patch is attached.  I think this simple approach is vastly
> > preferable to a comple tag system I'll never be able to remember)se
> > reliably.
>
> The problem with that is that after the attachment type change we have
> no information about the bug any more. It goes from "here's a possible
> solution" to "we didn't want it on the solutions list because of some
> reason".
>
> Having a "these are solution that need to be validated by upstream" list
> or "if you're interested in help improving the proposed solution" list
> would gain us much more.
>
This is true, but it's not worth another set of tags that no one will remember 
to use to try and get it.  

We need to stick with something very simple that is available in the U/I.

If it's a patch, tag it.  If you review it and it needs more work, untag it an 
comment.  That's simple enough we could actually do it.

Scott K