Stable Release Update Regression/Build Problem
Scott Kitterman
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Jun 25 03:21:42 BST 2008
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 13:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think I have a sense of it. I'll work up a diff and run it by the other
> members of motu-sru, ubuntu-sru, and the sru-verification teams.
>
> Scott K
As promised, here is the diff I propose. I'd appreciate concurrence from
members of the above teams. Comments from anyone are welcome too.
--- sru 2008-06-24 22:15:10.000000000 -0400
+++ sru.new 2008-06-24 22:17:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the
verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to
check for inadvertent side effects.
+The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the
verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to
check for inadvertent side effects. Verification must be done in a software
environment as close as is feasible to that which will exist after the
package is copied to *-updates for. Generally this will be with a system
that is up to date from *-release, *-security, and *-updates, but not other
packages from *-proposed.
If they discover that your fix is insufficient, or the test case is not
sufficient to reproduce the bug, they will:
If there are no objections from the relevant teams, I'll update the wiki page
with a suitably wikified version of this.
Scott K
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list