keeping track of regressions during the development cycle

[Sebastien Bacher]

On jeu, 2008-07-31 at 17:25 +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> A regression is a new bug, which wasn't present in previous versions
> of the
> software.
> 
> Most of the time, we don't know whether a bug is a regression or not,
> and we
> shouldn't assume that they are just because we haven't heard of them.
> 
> But where we can verify that a bug is a regression, e.g. was known to
> work
> in the previous release, it should be flagged as such and treated
> specially.

right, that makes sense to me, I just wanted to make sure that everybody
agrees that only the second class of issues should be nominated

Sebastien Bacher