SSLv2 - do we really need it?

[James Dinkel]

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Neal McBurnett <neal at bcn.boulder.co.us> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:41:24PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> In any case, IMO any app still stuck on SSLv2 needs to take note of what
>> century we are in and either catch up or rest in peace.
>
> Nicely put.  I wasn't disagreeing - just trying to identify any such
> and give them, and their users, more warning.
>
> -Neal
>

As was mentioned before, they'll be able to safely use Hardy for five
years, so they essentially have a 4 1/2 year warning.

James