jerone.young at canonical.com
Tue Dec 23 13:09:31 GMT 2008
Thanks for the links! My goodness 2004!
They also had a really good strategy to not break anything too. Very
well thoughtout. Maybe this shouldn't wait till dpkg 2.0 comes out
(which according to Jame's presentation is when Hel freezes over .. I
think Nostradamus here is too accurate at this point). Maybe this
shouldn't wait till 2.0. There are patches for the current dpkg now.
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 17:55 +0900, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Jerone Young
> <jerone.young at canonical.com> wrote:
> > Yeap. Or maybe something like /lib/x86 ../lib/x86_64 whould also be a
> > good more cleaner convention. Only time will tell what things actually
> > end up looking like.
> The Debian proposal appears to be lib/i386-linux, lib/x86_64-linux, etc.
> > What is the best place to discuss this or find old discussions on this
> > subject? debian mailing list?
> http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch/ seems a good overview with links to
> relevant lists.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20081223/b4199843/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel