[RFC] Moving Intrepid to 2.6.27 kernel

[Pete Graner]

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:47:46AM -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:00 AM,  <ubuntu-devel-request at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> I was in meetings all week and didn't see this until now.  Mario has raised
>>> a concern in this thread which I think needs to be addressed.  I also have
>>> the following questions:
>> Mario's concern is bunk with commit
>> 7946612de2087e163308e26034286fc2dc9dacf1 fyi.
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7946612de2087e163308e26034286fc2dc9dacf1
> 
> I assume you mean that his concern is in fact valid, but will be addressed
> when we bring this patch into our 2.6.27 tree.  Thanks for confirming this.
> 
>>> What are the known regressions from 2.6.26 to 2.6.27?
>> Most of the current regressions are here:
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/23/105
>>
>> But the majority of them are already fixed and here is the metabug:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
> 

This is a better view IMO of the meta bug:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=11167&hide_resolved=1

Currently showing 40 unresolved regressions.

> Thank you for these links.  Have the regressions found in the testing Ben
> mentioned been reported through this same mechanism?
> 


-- 
Pete Graner	<pgraner at canonical.com>