Future of the Packaging Guide
Jono Bacon
jono at ubuntu.com
Thu Sep 20 09:09:26 BST 2007
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 11:27 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > === Cons ===
> >
> > * probably no nice printable version
> > * malicious editing, harder to have QA for it
> > * work to get the DocBook -> Moin transition right
> > * what happens to the packaging-guide package?
> > * licensing
>
> I don't think any of these are show-stoppers, and they are mostly one-time
> issues.
I agree with mdz here - I think these are one-time issues which could be
solves.
> > === Pros ===
> >
> > * much easier to edit
> > * more accessible to everybody
> > * benefits of being able to easier merge docs or link from wiki
> > pages to others
> > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CategoryMOTUUbuntuPackagingMerge lists
> > a few apges, I'd merge into the Packaging Guide)
> > * more discoverable
> > * best way to deal with our manpower
>
> I think they're far outweighed by these benefits. What's most important is
> that the documentation be up-to-date, accurate and accessible, and the wiki
> seems the best way to accomplish that.
Indeed - I believe a move to the wiki will help keep the currency of the
guide and make it easier to maintain.
Jono
--
Jono Bacon
Ubuntu Community Manager
jono(at)ubuntu(dot)com
www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list