Using the "patch" tag for bugs

[Daniel Holbach]

On Mi, 2007-11-28 at 00:26 -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> To this end I had a talk with Christian (kiko) about maybe some things
> that can be improved. I've come up with the following list of bugs
> that may help. Please feel free to add to the discussion:
> 1. repeated bug in search for bugs with patches -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35030
> 2. Can't mark a patch as obsolete - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123915
> 3. show patch icon or notification on the comments page -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172507
> 4. Rows in bug listings should indicate if a patch exists -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4780
> 5. reject non-code patch attachements - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172501
> 6. ability to convert a comment into a patch attachment -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172505

Good work! I'm sure this is going to make a change!


> I also think it's useful to have a tag to indicate a "triaged" patch,
> that is one that is really a patch and ready for a dev to look at.

I feel we should make use of http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess
in that case.

Have a nice day,
 Dainel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20071128/c82097bc/attachment.pgp