QA and derivatives ( Re: Apport hooks (Re: The changing nature of bug reports))

[Krzysztof Lichota]

David Farning napisał(a):
> It would be useful if the CC, TB, and Canonical could start considering
> how derivatives can become good community members.  The basic balance we
> need to consider will be:
> 1 How can Ubuntu leverage the QA efforts of all of it's derivatives.
> 2 How can Ubuntu's derivatives leverage the larger Ubuntu communities QA
> efforts.
> 3 How can the the first two conditions be meet in a manner that is fair
> to all.
> 
> I have started fleshing out some guidelines for 'good' interactions with
> both our upstreams and downstreams at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Downstream and
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Upstream
> 
> The third step will be either encouraging derivatives to use Launch Pad
> as their issue tracker or enabling Launch Pad to work effectively with
> other downstream issue trackers.

I have already started wiki page with guidance for derivative
distributions which gives advice how to create good derivative distro.
It also mentions using Launchpad and cooperating with community.

See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeDistroHowto

	Krzysztof Lichota

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070305/30c305ac/attachment-0001.pgp