bzr for packaging

[Daniel Holbach]

Hello,

On Do, 2007-03-08 at 16:41 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> What are you doing?  What works well?  What is painful?  

I only use bzr for the packages I'm upstream for (bughelper, artwork
packages, etc.) and packages where the packaging was a team effort
(telepathy, galago).

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Processes/REVU outlines the new review
process we'll hope to implement soon. It describes the use of a simple
script in a few scenarios, where the Debian packaging is stored in bzr
and the tarball is either a) stored as .tar.gz in bzr or b) grabbed from
s location that's specified somewhere. I'm not sure this is good
practise for packaging in general, but I think it'll suit us quite well
in reviewing packages or improving packages in their early days.

Have a nice day,
 Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070309/a71bacaa/attachment.pgp