Restricting Sudo - Shall I write a spec
Soren Hansen
sh at linux2go.dk
Wed Mar 7 10:53:33 GMT 2007
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:12:37AM +0000, Mark Syms wrote:
> I've been thinking recently that Ubuntu is too permissive out of the
> box with regard to configuration of sudo. Would it be better for each
> of the admin tools that are installed in the basic install to
> add/remove themselves from a list of "authorised" sudo tools in their
> postinstall/prerm scripts?
Could you give an example of something that is currently allowed, but
you feel shouldn't be?
--
| Soren Hansen | Linux2Go | http://Linux2Go.dk/ |
| Seniorkonsulent | Lindholmsvej 42, 2. TH | +45 46 90 26 42 |
| sh at linux2go.dk | 9400 Norresundby, Denmark | GPG key: E8BDA4E3 |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20070307/30aa50ef/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list