Accepted ndiswrapper 1.38-1ubuntu1 (source)

Matt Zimmerman mdz at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 3 21:10:47 BST 2007


On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:04:11AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 08:45:10AM -0000, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> >> Changes:
> >>  ndiswrapper (1.38-1ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
> >>  .
> >>    * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
> >>      debian/control:
> >>      - Update description to point out that the kernel source package is
> >>        not required with the standard Ubuntu kernel.
> >
> > Any reason not to simply drop the -source package in Ubuntu?  That would
> > make it much more obvious.
> 
> AFAIK, people use it to build custom kernels.

The source is available in the ndiswrapper source package, and also in the
Ubuntu kernel source package.  I don't think we need another copy, and it's
confusing.

We removed some similar -source module packages, because people would use
them without realizing that the modules were already in the kernel, causing
confusing problems.

> >>      - Change the Maintainer address.
> >>    * Closes many bugs (LP: #32275, #65779, #92155, maybe others)
> >
> > At least some of these bugs sound like they're related to the package name
> > change from ndiswrapper-utils to ndiswrapper-utils-1.9, so I don't see how
> > your upload fixes them.  Can you explain?
> 
> #32275: Ndiswrapper no longer works with Netgear MA111
> - seems that I closed the wrong bug, or one bug too many ;)
> 
> #65779: ndiswrapper not dash friendly.
> - actually, this was fixed already by the previous release but not 
> closed
> 
> #92155: request to update
> - pretty clear to me

Has anything been done about the package name transition?  Is there still an
issue there?

-- 
 - mdz



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list