32-bit Firefox (Re: How long will 64bit Ubuntu users have towait?)
Tollef Fog Heen
tfheen at canonical.com
Mon Sep 11 09:10:27 BST 2006
* Matt Zimmerman
| The latter would be preferable, as it avoids duplicating the source and
| automatically stays up to date as the package changes. The bi-arch support
| in our compiler should make it possible to build both 64-bit and 32-bit
| binaries during the same build, if the necessary development packages are
| arranged.
This is the big problem -- firefox build-depends on a bunch of
libraries like libxt-dev and libx11-dev which would require those to
exist in a 32-bit build for amd64. Similarly, we would need a build
of gtk, orbit, freetype, cairo. At some point, you're really running
half your desktop in 32 bit mode. To be honest -- I don't see the
point, it's not worth the maintenance for the distro team and I would
rather see the effort being used for proper multiarch.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list