Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?
carribeiro at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 01:18:09 BST 2006
On 10/23/06, Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton at cc.hut.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
> > On 10/7/06, Pavel Rojtberg <pavel at madman2k.net> wrote:
> >> I, for one, would vote for switching but Id like to hear the official
> >> position.
> > Back to the start of the thread... when are we going to hear the
> > position on this? I mean, it's fine for we folks to discuss, but I would
> > like to hear something official (perhaps Matt Zimmerman, or even Mark
> > Shuttleworth, given the importance of Firefox for end users). Release
> > is coming...
> Maybe this doesn't qualify as official, but here you go (unnecessary
> rows removed):
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:56:42 -0700
> Source: firefox
> Version: 2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu1
> Distribution: edgy
> Changed-By: Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com>
> firefox (2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu1) edgy; urgency=low
> * Bump version to 2.0 (no upstream changes from rc3)
> * browser/components/search/nsSearchService.js
> - Set MOZ_OFFICIAL to "official", distributionID to "com.ubuntu"
> * debian/branding: new subdirectory with images
> * debian/rules:
> - build: uudecode and substitute images in source tree, use
> instead of debian/firefox.png
> - clean: restore images in source tree, remove uudecoded versions
Sorry, but I don't get it. It's "official"... but which icon is "icon64.png"?
Is it the official Firefox icon? Or is it the Debian one?
Consultoria em Projetos
mail: carribeiro at gmail.com
mail: carribeiro at yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-devel