Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?

[Carlos Ribeiro]

On 10/23/06, Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton at cc.hut.fi> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > On 10/7/06, Pavel Rojtberg <pavel at madman2k.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> I, for one, would vote for switching but Id like to hear the official
> >> position.
> >>
> >
> > Back to the start of the thread... when are we going to hear the
> *official*
> > position on this? I mean, it's fine for we folks to discuss, but I would
> > like to hear something official (perhaps Matt Zimmerman, or even Mark
> > Shuttleworth, given the importance of Firefox for end users). Release
> date
> > is coming...
>
> Maybe this doesn't qualify as official, but here you go (unnecessary
> rows removed):
>
> --
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:56:42 -0700
> Source: firefox
> Version: 2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu1
> Distribution: edgy
> Changed-By: Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com>
> Changes:
>   firefox (2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu1) edgy; urgency=low
>   .
>     * Bump version to 2.0 (no upstream changes from rc3)
>     * browser/components/search/nsSearchService.js
>       - Set MOZ_OFFICIAL to "official", distributionID to "com.ubuntu"
>     * debian/branding: new subdirectory with images
>     * debian/rules:
>       - build: uudecode and substitute images in source tree, use
> debian/branding/icon64.png
>         instead of debian/firefox.png
>       - clean: restore images in source tree, remove uudecoded versions
>

Sorry, but I don't get it. It's "official"... but which icon is "icon64.png"?
Is it the official Firefox icon? Or is it the Debian one?

-- 
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: carribeiro at gmail.com
mail: carribeiro at yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061023/9e43eaf2/attachment-0001.htm