Is this a dsfg violation?
Scott Dier
dieman at ringworld.org
Thu Oct 19 01:43:16 BST 2006
Additionally -- already patched files outside the debian directory is OK.
Generally, the orig.tar.gz is untouched and the diff.gz are the patches.
Some packages use additional patch management which are stored in
debian/. Some packages have to remove certain objects before
redistribution (kernel in some cases, firefox in this case, etc) so
those bits are removed or edited before the orig.tar.gz is made as to
meet legal requirements.
As far as I know, this is how it works in Debian and expect it to work
similarly in this case, so I don't see a problem.
THanks,
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> Em Qui, 2006-10-19 às 06:45 +0800, Joel Bryan Juliano escreveu:
>> I grabbed a fresh firefox source from edgy, and a quick grep gives
>> already patched files outside debian/ directory.
>>
>> firefox-1.99+2.0rc2+dfsg$ grep -lR -i "ubuntu" *
>> browser/app/firefox-branding.js
>> browser/base/content/utilityOverlay.js
>> browser/locales/en-US/chrome/branding/brand.dtd
>> browser/locales/en-US/chrome/branding/brand.properties
>> browser/locales/en-US/chrome/browser-region/region.properties
>> browser/locales/en-US/profile/bookmarks.html
>> debian/BBC-RSS-URL-promise.txt
>> debian/changelog
>> debian/control
>> debian/debsearch.src
>> debian/rules
>> debian/wikipedia.src
>> extensions/spellcheck/locales/en-US/myspell/en-US.dic
>> extensions/spellcheck/locales/en-US/myspell/mozilla_words.diff
>> toolkit/components/printing/content/printdialog.js
>> xpfe/browser/resources/locale/en-US/region.properties
>> xpfe/global/resources/content/printdialog.js
>>
>> but according to dfsg,
>>
>
> In addition to what Michael Poole said, I'd like to remind you that the
> Debian Free Software Guidelines apply to Debian, and Ubuntu may use a
> different set of guidelines to consider software for inclusion in main.
>
> Cheers,
> Evandro
>
>
--
Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list