Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?
toby.smithe at gmail.com
Wed Oct 11 21:52:46 BST 2006
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:44 +0200, Josué Alcalde González wrote:
> El mié, 11-10-2006 a las 18:40 +0100, Toby Smithe escribió:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 10:48 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:52 -0700, Daniel Robitaille wrote:
> > > >
> > > This would certainly be my preferred option also. If we can't ship
> > > Firefox under that name in main, I would rather we shipped firefox
> > > elsewhere for "people who want it", and then chose a better integrated
> > > browser such as Epiphany as our default.
> > This is definitely the route I'd prefer to take.
> It would be the route to take if we could ship epiphany without firefox,
> but we need firefox or iceweasel installed to install epiphany.
That is not the case. The current Epiphany version builds perfectly
again XULRunner since at least 1.8 (the first time I tested it).
More information about the ubuntu-devel