Is Ubuntu going to adapt Ice Weasel?

[Gabriel Puliatti]

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 12:52 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Epiphany isn't "better integrated" IMHO...
> 
> Well, of course the GNOME <-> Epiphany integration is rather okay, but
> the Epiphany <-> Gecko/etc. integration seems to be pretty worthless,

What do you mean Epiphany <-> Gecko? Epiphany uses Gecko, just like
Firefox. Most of the Epiphany bugs are actually small GTK bugs, which
force it to do things it shouldn't.

However, most of these are easily fixable using python extensions not
larger that 50 lines. Furthermore, the ability to mod the browser as
much as we can using epiphany will allow for better adaptability and
integration. If building a Desktop is the goal, then using a browser
made for Windows is not a good choice.

-- 
No violence, gentlemen -- no violence, I beg of you!  Consider the
furniture!
                -- Sherlock Holmes

Gabriel Puliatti
foo at predius.org
predius.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061011/4047add5/attachment.pgp