openoffice bashing [was Re: How long will 64bit Ubuntu users have to wait?]

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 23:54 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote:

> Op ma, 02-10-2006 te 09:45 +0100, schreef Scott James Remnant:
> > It's not just slow, buggy, unstable and with a hideously inconsistent
> > interface -- it's also entirely unfriendly to use for anyone who
> > hasn't ever used an "office suite" before. 
> 
> GCC is not just slow, (sometimes) buggy, unstable (ABI & syntax changes
> every version) and with a sometimes really inconsistent and confusing
> interface -- it's also entirely unfriendly to use for anyone who has
> never used a "command line compiler" before.
> 
Agree; also that emacs is a terrible programmer's editor, and that gdb
is an inherently awful debugger.

So much badness, so little time *sigh*

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20061004/278aa7ed/attachment.pgp