why did Ubuntu turn off kernel preemption in Edgy?

[t u]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Luka Renko wrote:
> On Monday 27 November 2006 02:59, Ben Collins wrote:
>> It was a few of those very hackers that told me PREEMPT was a red
>> herring, and 1000HZ was not suggested. It's not a bug that 1000 timer
>> interrupts a second causes extra CPU load. Think of it this way: 1000HZ
>> is 10 times more interrupts than 100HZ. That's 10 times more CPU load
>> from just that functionality.

sorry to cause noise on this. Is there a bug filed for this preempt
situation. I just came across a bug regarding sound skipping when
installing packages and tried to find an already-filed bug but I couldn't.

thanks.

- --
Please scan all attachments for viruses.
Or (though you might like Rodin) you might as well avoid "The Gates of
Hell" and use Linux.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFao3rLM1JzWwJYEYRAsDlAJ9fWXL+l3Ul0fSnbbAFTIVjJMGfPQCgiQn9
60pxlLNJ9HWRclPiWtz3c/g=
=5YB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----