problem of nvidia-glx and xorg-driver-fglrx

[jacky]

I got it. Thanks.

And I found another problem: xorg-driver-fglrx only
depend on linux-restricted-modules-common, doesn't
depend on linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 or
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic. And
linux-restricted-modules-common doesn't depend on
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 or
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic.
I think xorg-driver-fglrx should depend on
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 or
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic, like
nvidia-glx. 
Or linux-restricted-modules-common should depend on
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 or
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic and remove
nvidia-kernel-1.0.8774.

--- Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3.net>wrote:

> jacky wrote:
> > I noted that xorg-driver-fglrx conflicts with
> nvidia-glx. I am so
> > strange of this. Can't they work together?
> 
> They both divert libGL.so, so no, they can't really
> work together in any
> meaningful way.  I had tossed around the idea at one
> point of writing a
> libGL wrapper that could at least allow us to avoid
> diverting it, but it
> still wouldn't let you use both fglrx and nvidia
> together, as
> applications would have no way of specifying which
> libGL they wanted to
> write to.
> 
> (Okay, I suppose if the wrapper was Xinerama-aware
> and other fancy
> things, and could throw calls for one card to one
> libGL and calls for
> another to the other, it could perhaps work, but
> this all just sounds
> very sick, twisted, and utterly wrong... If you
> really want them to be
> able to work together, encourage NVIDIA and ATI to
> work with the
> Xorg/mesa folk on unifying libGL instead of
> providing their own)
> 
> > Also, I noted that nvidia-glx depend on 
> > linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386. I must
> install 
> > linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 even if I
> have installed
> > linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic.
> 
> This isn't actually true.  nvidia-glx depends on
> nvidia-kernel-1.0.8774,
> which is provided by all the various LRM packages. 
> If you install
> nvidia-glx without having an LRM installed, apt will
> try to pull in
> -386, because it's the first alphabetically, but if
> -generic is already
> installed this definitely doesn't happen:
> 
> (base)adconrad at cthulhu:~$ dpkg -l
> linux-restricted-modules\* | grep ^i |
> awk '{print $2}'
> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic
> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-9-generic
> linux-restricted-modules-common
> linux-restricted-modules-generic
> (base)adconrad at cthulhu:~$ sudo apt-get install
> nvidia-glx
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Suggested packages:
>   nvidia-kernel-source
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   nvidia-glx
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
> upgraded.
> Need to get 4066kB of archives.
> After unpacking 12.6MB of additional disk space will
> be used.
> 
> ... Adam
> 



	

	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Mp3疯狂搜-新歌热歌高速下
http://music.yahoo.com.cn/?source=mail_mailbox_footer