Updated "Minimalistic", patching usplash, sources

[Matthew East]

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:02 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > > Can't see why horrible usplash manage to be accepted while great are
> > > rejected. 
> > 
> > Because we are at T-16days!!!
> 
> This is reason for good choices, not wrong one.

The proximity of the release is part of the factors which define what
choices are "good" and which are "wrong". The relevant developers have
explained what these factors are on this thread, so now is the time to
accept the decision. Continuing this thread is simply wasting precious
time which the developers need to spend fixing bugs, so please END IT
HERE.

> > Edgy is 17 days away, hold your horses...
> 
> Edgy is 16 days+Ubuntu conference+edgy repos enabling. That's quite a
> month for waiting :)

I am confident that you can wait that long.

Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060515/fa9f019c/attachment.pgp