unnecessary QA work (was Re: dapper-live test)
James "Doc" Livingston
doclivingston at gmail.com
Fri May 5 12:13:26 BST 2006
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:22 +0530, Jason Stewart wrote:
> But I believe the process should be:
>
> 1) Please look to see if your bug has already been posted
> 2) If you find an existing bug and you are *sure* that your bug is the
> same, then there is no need to file a new bug
> 3) If you are not 100% sure that your bug is identical, please post a new bug.
I would probably add 'and mention "This may be a duplicate of bug X"' to
step 3. If the reporter does that, it would probably be easier for a
developer to quickly check and mark as a duplicate if it is one.
Cheers,
James "Doc" Livingston
--
It's not that I'm lazy; it's that I just don't care -- Office Space
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list